The Honourable Karina Gould
President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada
Minister of Democratic Institutions
ISSN: 2368-3317
Catalogue: CE31-2/2017E-PDF
As President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, I am pleased to table the Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat’s (CICS) 2016-17 Departmental Results Report.
The Secretariat’s mandate is to provide the administrative support services required for the planning and conduct of federal-provincial-territorial and provincial-territorial conferences of First Ministers, Ministers and Deputy Ministers across Canada.
Our government made a commitment to Canadians to pursue our goals with a renewed sense of collaboration. Improved partnerships with provincial and territorial governments are essential to deliver the real, positive change that we promised Canadians. The multilateral intergovernmental conference is a key instrument for open communication, consultation and collaboration among federal, provincial and territorial governments.
In fiscal year 2016-17, the Secretariat served 141 conferences across 47 sectors of intergovernmental activity, including Education, Environment, Health, Justice, Indigenous Affairs and a First Ministers’ Meeting held in December 2016.
Going forward, CICS will continue to adapt its service delivery model so that it remains client-focused and responsive to the current environment.
5,241,938
Actual Spending
31
Actual FTEs
For more information on the department’s plans, priorities and results achieved, see the “Results: what we achieved” section of this report.
The President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada is responsible for this organization. The Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat (CICS), established pursuant to an agreement reached at the May 1973 First Ministers’ Conference, is an agency of the federal, provincial and territorial governments. Its mandate is to provide administrative support and planning services for intergovernmental conferences of First Ministers, Ministers and Deputy Ministers.
These intergovernmental conferences are a key instrument for consultation and negotiation among the different orders of government and assist in the development of national and/or provincial/territorial policies. They are a critical component of the workings of the Canadian federation and represent a core principle of our democratic society.
By skillfully executing the logistical planning and delivery of these meetings, CICS not only relieves governments of the administrative process burden but also allows them to greatly benefit from significant cost efficiencies and economies of scale.
The mandate of the Secretariat is to support federal, provincial and territorial governments in the planning and conduct of senior level intergovernmental conferences held across Canada. The primary objective of CICS is to relieve client departments of the numerous technical and administrative tasks associated with the planning and conduct of multilateral conferences, thereby enabling participants to concentrate on substantive intergovernmental policy issues. CICS provides continuous, effective, impartial administrative services to these meetings.
The planning and conduct of multilateral meetings of First Ministers, Ministers and Deputy Ministers is a critical component of the workings of the Canadian federation. By skillfully and professionally planning and delivering services at these meetings, CICS allows governments to discuss important issues without getting distracted by process. The risk of error and omission is significantly mitigated by tapping into the Secretariat’s experience and impartiality.
The interests of all Canadians are represented by their elected governments participating in these intergovernmental conferences.
As an institution dedicated to supporting events that give rise to, and support the spirit of cooperation and negotiation among governments, CICS seeks to execute its role to maximum effect, creating an environment conducive to productive discourse and optimal decision-making, to the benefit of all Canadians.
Federal, provincial and territorial governments greatly benefit from significant cost efficiencies and economies of scale through the use of CICS. This is particularly relevant in the current fiscal environment.
For more general information about the department, see the “Supplementary information” section of this report. For more information on the department’s organizational mandate letter commitments, see the Minister’s mandate letter.i
The fall 2015 federal election marked the beginning of a new era in intergovernmental relations. The new administration, sworn in on November 4, 2015, framed its priorities with an increased focus on federal-provincial-territorial relations. They also vowed to re-instate the annual First Ministers’ Meetings. These commitments have led to an increase in intergovernmental conferences of all types and we anticipate the trend to continue.
Security is a prevalent topic in the current environment. Whether physical or IT-related, the culture is one of hyper-awareness. Security is embedded into CICS policy frameworks, day-to-day operations and employee behaviours. The Secretariat will continue to ensure that security mechanisms and resources are planned, efficient and effective, as well as in line with government policies.
There are six anticipated elections over the next two years at the provincial-territorial level. As new governments come to power and others are re-elected, it is important for CICS to strengthen its relationship with our clients and actively market the organization as a neutral intergovernmental agency. Communication efforts should be ongoing in order to sustain and even increase the number of intergovernmental conferences we serve.
This continues to be a time of fiscal restraint for the provinces and territories and these realities do have an impact on our organization. For instance, in 2016-17 we served 46 virtual conferences (teleconference- and videoconference), compared to 42 in 2015-16 and 19 in 2014-15. As with the federal government, provincial and territorial governments are modernizing, seeking efficiencies wherever possible, reducing travel and exploring the use of new technologies. CICS is proud to continue to offer a wide array of conference solutions that respond to these needs.
In the next few years, a significant number of the Secretariat’s federal public servants will be eligible to retire. These retirements along with the provincial-territorial secondment rotations will challenge CICS’ ability to sustain a knowledgeable workforce with the appropriate competencies. Carrying out meaningful succession and transition plans which include conserving corporate memory will continue to be a critical strategic priority.
Retention of young, ambitious and motivated staff creates a unique challenge for a micro agency such as CICS due to employees’ limited upward mobility within such a small organization. The agency now makes use of the Federal Student Work Exchange Program across all divisions on a regular basis to encourage interest in the public service. Sustained efforts will be exerted to maintain and improve employee retention by creating an environment conducive to career development and job satisfaction.
Risks | Mitigating strategy and effectiveness | Link to the department’s Programs | Link to departmental priorities |
---|---|---|---|
Human Resource Management
There is a risk that the organization will be unable to sustain an adequate workforce with the appropriate competencies due to a large turnover of staff (retirements & departures, provincial-territorial secondment rotations, peak period staffing), resulting in potential errors, client dissatisfaction, and loss of confidence in the organization. |
This risk was identified in the 2016-17 RPP and continues to be a key risk because in a micro-agency, the departure of one employee has an impact on the organization.
In 2016-17, CICS successfully mitigated the Human Resource Management Risk through the implementation of its Human Resource Plan and Succession Plan for key positions. Going forward, the same mitigation strategies identified in the 2016-17 RPP will be used and greater importance will be placed on creating pools for key positions and having experienced personnel mentor new employees. |
Conference Services;
Internal Services |
Cultivate a continuous learning environment |
Governance and strategic direction
There is a risk that the provincial-territorial stakeholders may not perceive CICS as being neutral because of recent federal initiatives which could negatively affect the number of requests for services being requested for provincial-territorial meetings. |
This risk was identified in the 2016-17 RPP and continues to be a key risk because CICS must ensure that all 14 jurisdictions recognize its services as being equal, impartial and confidential to all clients.
In 2016-17, CICS successfully mitigated this risk by strengthening provincial/territorial partnerships, respecting the exemptions from the Federal Access to Information and Privacy Act and the Federal Identity Program. Discussions with key players around the impacts of other transformation initiatives will be ongoing. |
Conference Services | Enhance and expand strategic partnerships |
Financial Management
There is a risk that sufficient resources may not be available to maintain quality service levels for client groups because of rising operational costs, fiscal restraints and increased stakeholder expectations. |
This risk was identified in the 2016-17 RPP and was successfully mitigated through rigorous forecasting, effective budgeting and stronger internal controls.
As a result of these measures, the Financial Management Risk has been reduced to an acceptable level and is no longer ranked as a key risk in our Risk Management Plan. |
Conference Services;
Internal Services |
Efficient and effective use of resources |
Provision of expert, impartial support services for the planning and conduct of First Ministers, Ministers and Deputy Ministers level federal-provincial-territorial and provincial-territorial conferences.
The CICS does not convene intergovernmental meetings. It is called upon to respond to decisions taken by governments to meet on key issues. Decisions concerning the location of such meetings, their number in a given fiscal year, their timing and duration, are all factors, beyond the control of the Secretariat. The level of CICS expenditures for each fiscal year is, however, directly affected by these factors.
Priority: | Enhance and expand strategic partnerships |
---|---|
Description: | In order for CICS to successfully deliver its strategic outcome, the agency must be recognized among governments as the key conference service provider for senior level intergovernmental meetings. Through improved dialogue and greater collaboration with our partners and clients, this priority will help maintain our existing clientele and increase our visibility among potential partners. |
Planned Initiatives: |
|
Results Obtained in Support of Planned Initiatives
Priority: | Ensure a relevant, responsive service delivery model |
---|---|
Description: | This priority will ensure continuous improvement in the service delivery model by aligning people, processes and technologies to reflect the current environment, the demands of the future and the changing needs of clients. |
Planned Initiatives: |
|
Results Obtained in Support of Planned Initiatives
Performance is assessed using internal data and documents as well as two surveys of clients; one an annual sampling of conference planners and the second of conference delegates who attend the events.
In 2016-17, CICS provided its services to 141 senior-level intergovernmental conferences, a 24% increase over the previous year’s total. The number of in-person meetings increased by 31%, going from 72 to 94 meetings year-over-year, while the number of teleconferences increased by 15% (from 40 to 46), continuing to indicate clients’ definite interest in this meeting format as a viable, cost- and time-effective way for governments to confer.
Overall, client satisfaction levels continue to be very high. For conference delegates, client satisfaction was just under our 90% target while for conference planners, the same 90% target was exceeded with a satisfaction rate of 94.4%, the second annual increase in this rate of satisfaction. While the words professional, efficient and organized continue to be used most often by planners and delegates alike to describe the quality of services provided by CICS in support of intergovernmental meetings, many also mention our organization’s competence, expertise and overall excellence.
There continued to be increases in the degree of satisfaction of meeting planners regarding CICS’ flexibility and adaptability vis-à-vis their changing needs during planning, as well as our ability to identify conference media coverage requirements and to recommend options to address these requirements. All respondents agreed or strongly agreed about CICS’ planning services having resulted in an effectively and efficiently run conference that met operational expectations, as well as their willingness to call upon CICS again to plan and deliver their future intergovernmental conferences. Very high praise was also obtained regarding CICS staff’s and contractors’ courteousness, knowledge and responsiveness to participants’ needs during conferences.
Flexibility and adaptability must continue to be a main focus for the organization, to ensure that we continue to be nimble and to adjust quickly to changing client needs and requests during the planning and conduct of conferences. However, this must continue to be balanced with the need to deliver our services in the most cost effective way possible.
Expected results | Performance indicators | Target | Date to achieve target | 2016–17 Actual results |
2015–16 Actual results |
2014–15 Actual results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Professionally planned and supported conferences, including effectively addressing unforeseen challenges. | Client satisfaction levels for the full range of CICS services provided in support of PT and FPT conferences. | 90% or higher positive response rate. | March 31, 2017 | 94.4% | 92.5% | 90.5% |
Clients’ and conference participants’ conference needs identified and addressed accordingly. | Client satisfaction levels for the full range of CICS services provided in support of PT and FPT conferences. | 90% or higher positive response rate. | March 31, 2017 | 86.7% | 90.4% | 96.3% |
2016–17 Main Estimates |
2016–17 Planned spending |
2016–17 Total authorities available for use |
2016–17 Actual spending (authorities used) |
2016–17 Difference (actual minus planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|
4,163,437 | 4,056,344 | 4,269,683 | 3,580,015 | (476,329) |
2016–17 Planned |
2016–17 Actual |
2016–17 Difference actual minus planned) |
---|---|---|
23 | 23 | 0 |
Internal Services are those groups of related activities and resources that the federal government considers to be services in support of programs and/or required to meet corporate obligations of an organization. Internal Services refers to the activities and resources of the 10 distinct service categories that support Program delivery in the organization, regardless of the Internal Services delivery model in a department. The 10 service categories are: Management and Oversight Services; Communications Services; Legal Services; Human Resources Management Services; Financial Management Services; Information Management Services; Information Technology Services; Real Property Services; Materiel Services; and Acquisition Services.
Priority: | Effective and efficient use of resources |
---|---|
Description: | CICS aims to be an agile department, where internal processes are continuously reviewed, improved and streamlined to be end-to-end, integrated and efficient. |
Planned Initiatives: |
|
Results Obtained in Support of Planned Initiatives:
Priority: | Cultivate a continuous learning environment |
---|---|
Description: | The agency’s greatest asset remains its employees. This priority will seek ways to engage employees and recognize their efforts in order to foster a culture of continual improvement and innovation. |
Planned Initiatives: |
|
Results Obtained in Support of Planned Initiatives:
2016–17 Main Estimates |
2016–17 Planned spending |
2016–17 Total authorities available for use |
2016–17 Actual spending (authorities used) |
2016–17 Difference (actual minus planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1,811,533 | 1,798,677 | 1,831,462 | 1,661,923 | (136,754) |
2016–17 Planned |
2016–17 Actual |
2016–17 Difference actual minus planned) |
---|---|---|
9 | 8 | (1) |
Programs and Internal Services | 2016–17 Main Estimates |
2016–17 Planned spending |
2017–18 Planned spending |
2018–19 Planned spending |
2016–17 Total authorities available for use |
2016–17 Actual spending (authorities used) |
2015–16 Actual spending (authorities used) |
2014–15 Actual spending (authorities used) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conference Services | 4,163,437 | 4,056,344 | 4,442,435 | 4,442,435 | 4,269,683 | 3,580,015 | 3,561,128 | 3,508,894 |
Internal Services | 1,811,533 | 1,798,677 | 1,402,874 | 1,402,874 | 1,831,462 | 1,661,923 | 1,709,423 | 1,660,593 |
Total | 5,974,970 | 5,855,021 | 5,845,309 | 5,845,309 | 6,101,145 | 5,241,938 | 5,270,551 | 5,169,487 |
It is important to note that CICS does not convene intergovernmental meetings. The Secretariat responds to decisions taken by governments to meet on key national or specific issues. The location, number, timing and duration of meeting are factors that are beyond the control of the Secretariat. CICS does exercise due care and probity in the expenditure of its funds to meet its mandate.
The Secretariat is funded at a level sufficient to finance 100 in person conferences annually. An event can consist of one or more conferences and is used to plan the budget for each of the conferences in terms of transportation and communication, rentals, translation and interpretation services. Over the past three years, there has been a gradual increase in conference activity.
The spending has been stable for the last two years ($5.2 million). CICS continues to ensure a relevant, responsive service delivery model while ensuring an effective and efficient use of resources. As a result, savings were generated from an increased number of teleconferences and virtual conferences. Since jurisdictions participate remotely by video or telephone, these types of meetings significantly reduce costs for CICS. Operating costs by event were lower in most cases, which allowed CICS to deliver a higher volume of conferences (2016-2017: 141 conferences and 2015-16: 114 conferences) without increasing the overall costs.
Programs and Internal Services | 2014–15 Actual |
2015–16 Actual |
2016–17 Planned |
2016–17 Actual |
2017–18 Planned |
2018–19 Planned |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conference Services | 18 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 25 |
Internal Services | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
Total | 27 | 31 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 32 |
CICS human resources have been stable for the last two years. As a proactive measure, the Secretariat has put in place a succession plan to address potential departures, mostly due to retirement. With the gradual increase in conference activity, CICS must maintain a strong and qualified workforce in place.
For information on the Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat’s organizational voted and statutory expenditures, consult the Public Accounts of Canada 2017ii.
Program | Spending area | Government of Canada activity | Total planned spending | 2016–17 Actual spending |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conference Services | Government affairs | Well-managed and efficient government operations | 4,056,344 | 3,580,015 |
The Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat’s financial statements [unaudited] for the year ended March 31, 2017, are available on the departmental websiteiv.
Financial information | 2016–17 Planned results |
2016–17 Actual |
2015–16 Actual |
Difference (2016–17 actual minus 2016–17 planned) |
Difference (2016–17 actual minus 2015–16 actual) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total expenses | 6,420,233 | 5,735,273 | 5,845,908 | (684,960) | (110,635) |
Total revenues | – | – | – | – | – |
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers | 6,420,233 | 5,735,273 | 5,845,908 | (684,960) | (110,635) |
Total expenses were approximately $5.7 million, $110 thousand less than the previous year’s expenses. Savings were generated from an increased number of teleconferences and virtual conferences. This trend is expected to continue. This also explains the $685 thousand variance with the planned results. CICS does not convene intergovernmental meetings and responds to decisions taken by governments to meet on key national or specific issues. It should be noted that expenses are recorded on an accrual basis in the Financial Statements and include charges paid on our behalf by other government departments.
Financial information | 2016–17 | 2015-16 | Difference (2016–17 minus 2015–16) |
---|---|---|---|
Total net liabilities | 782,993 | 903,036 | (120,043) |
Total net financial assets | 561,127 | 658,907 | (97,780) |
Departmental net debt | 221,866 | 244,129 | (22,263) |
Total non-financial assets | 118,293 | 116,273 | 2,020 |
Departmental net financial position | (103,573) | (127,406) | 23,833 |
Total liabilities were approximately $783 thousand, a decrease of some $120 thousand (13%) over the previous year. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities make up the largest component representing 70% of total liabilities. The decrease is mainly due to a decrease in accounts payable to support normal operations including accrued salary and wages. The liabilities consist of accounts payable to external parties ($550 thousand), vacation pay and compensatory leave ($91 thousand) as well as employee future benefits ($142 thousand)
Total net financial assets were approximately $561 thousand as at March 31, 2017, a decrease of some $98 thousand (15%) over the previous year. The decrease is mainly due to a decrease in the amount due from the Consolidated Revenue Fund by some $142 thousand and a decrease in receivables from other government departments and agencies. Amounts due from the Consolidated Revenue Fund represent a charge against departmental authorities and are available for use to the organization without further authorities.
Appropriate minister: The Honourable Karina Gould
Institutional head: André M. McArdle
Ministerial portfolio: President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada; Minister of Democratic Institutions
Enabling instrument: The Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat was established pursuant to an agreement reached at the May 1973 First Ministers’ Conference and was designated a department of the federal government by an Order-in-Council dated November 29, 1973.
Year of incorporation / commencement: 1973
The Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat’s Strategic Outcome and Program Alignment Architecture of record for 2016–17 are shown below.
1.1 Program: Conference Services
Internal Services
The following supplementary information tables are available on the Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat’s website v:
The tax system can be used to achieve public policy objectives through the application of special measures such as low tax rates, exemptions, deductions, deferrals and credits. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for these measures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures .viii This report also provides detailed background information on tax expenditures, including descriptions, objectives, historical information and references to related federal spending programs. The tax measures presented in this report are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance.
Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 488, Station ‘A’
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8V5
Location
222 Queen St., 12th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5V9
General Inquiries: 613-995-2341
Fax: 613-996-6091
E-mail: Info@scics.ca
appropriation (crédit)
Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)
Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.
Core Responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)
An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a Core Responsibility are reflected in one or more related Departmental Results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.
Departmental Plan (Plan ministériel)
Provides information on the plans and expected performance of appropriated departments over a three-year period. Departmental Plans are tabled in Parliament each spring.
Departmental Result (résultat ministériel)
A Departmental Result represents the change or changes that the department seeks to influence. A Departmental Result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.
Departmental Result Indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)
A factor or variable that provides a valid and reliable means to measure or describe progress on a Departmental Result.
Departmental Results Framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)
Consists of the department’s Core Responsibilities, Departmental Results and Departmental Result Indicators.
Departmental Results Report (Rapport sur les résultats ministériels)
Provides information on the actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.
Evaluation (évaluation)
In the Government of Canada, the systematic and neutral collection and analysis of evidence to judge merit, worth or value. Evaluation informs decision making, improvements, innovation and accountability. Evaluations typically focus on programs, policies and priorities and examine questions related to relevance, effectiveness and efficiency. Depending on user needs, however, evaluations can also examine other units, themes and issues, including alternatives to existing interventions. Evaluations generally employ social science research methods.
full-time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)
A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person-year charge against a departmental budget. Full-time equivalents are calculated as a ratio of assigned hours of work to scheduled hours of work. Scheduled hours of work are set out in collective agreements.
government-wide priorities (priorités pangouvernementales)
For the purpose of the 2016–17 Departmental Results Report, government-wide priorities refers to those high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the 2015 Speech from the Throne, namely: Growth for the Middle Class; Open and Transparent Government; A Clean Environment and a Strong Economy; Diversity is Canada’s Strength; and Security and Opportunity.
horizontal initiatives (initiative horizontale)
An initiative where two or more federal organizations, through an approved funding agreement, work toward achieving clearly defined shared outcomes, and which has been designated (for example, by Cabinet or a central agency) as a horizontal initiative for managing and reporting purposes.
Management, Resources and Results Structure (Structure de la gestion, des ressources et des résultats)
A comprehensive framework that consists of an organization’s inventory of programs, resources, results, performance indicators and governance information. Programs and results are depicted in their hierarchical relationship to each other and to the Strategic Outcome(s) to which they contribute. The Management, Resources and Results Structure is developed from the Program Alignment Architecture.
non-budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)
Net outlays and receipts related to loans, investments and advances, which change the composition of the financial assets of the Government of Canada.
performance (rendement)
What an organization did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the organization intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.
performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)
A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an organization, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.
performance reporting (production de rapports sur le rendement)
The process of communicating evidence-based performance information. Performance reporting supports decision making, accountability and transparency.
planned spending (dépenses prévues)
For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts that receive Treasury Board approval by February 1. Therefore, planned spending may include amounts incremental to planned expenditures presented in the Main Estimates.
A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.
plans (plans)
The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how an organization intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead up to the expected result.
priorities (priorité)
Plans or projects that an organization has chosen to focus and report on during the planning period. Priorities represent the things that are most important or what must be done first to support the achievement of the desired Strategic Outcome(s).
program (programme)
A group of related resource inputs and activities that are managed to meet specific needs and to achieve intended results and that are treated as a budgetary unit.
Program Alignment Architecture (architecture d’alignement des programmes)
A structured inventory of an organization’s programs depicting the hierarchical relationship between programs and the Strategic Outcome(s) to which they contribute.
results (résultat)
An external consequence attributed, in part, to an organization, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single organization, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the organization’s influence.
statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)
Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.
Strategic Outcome (résultat stratégique)
A long-term and enduring benefit to Canadians that is linked to the organization’s mandate, vision and core functions.
sunset program (programme temporisé)
A time-limited program that does not have an ongoing funding and policy authority. When the program is set to expire, a decision must be made whether to continue the program. In the case of a renewal, the decision specifies the scope, funding level and duration.
target (cible)
A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.
voted expenditures (dépenses votées)
Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an Appropriation Act. The Vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.
i. The Minister’s mandate letter, http://pm.gc.ca/eng/mandate-letters
ii. Public Accounts of Canada 2017, http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/recgen/cpc-pac/index-eng.html
iii. Whole-of-government framework, https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ems-sgd/edb-bdd/index-eng.html#tag-nav/~(current_branch~’GOCO~sort_key~’name~sort_direction~’asc~open_nodes~(~’tag_SA0001~’tag_SA9999~’tag_SA0002~’tag_SA0003~’tag_SA0004~’tag_SA0005))
iv. Unaudited Financial Statements, https://scics.ca/en/publication/unaudited-financial-statements-2016-17/
v. Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat’s website , https://scics.ca/en/
vi. Greening Government Operations, https://scics.ca/en/publication/greening-government-operations-2016-17/
vii. Internal Audits and Evaluations, https://scics.ca/en/publication/internal-audits-and-evaluations-2016-17/
viii. Report on Federal Tax Expenditures, http://www.fin.gc.ca/purl/taxexp-eng.asp